The judge and his porn
If you haven't been following the Kozinski kerfuffle, here's a helpful roundup of links.
InstaPundit's tongue-in-cheek take: "Since it's generally thought that men are disproportionate consumers of porn because of their gender, and because, hormonally, they're driven to favor visual stimuli, then obviously punishing porn consumption constitutes sex discrimination, and is probably unconstitutional. Plus, research establishes that porn is good for America. You don't hate America, do you?" Heh.
I'm sorry, there's an obsenity trial for porn going on in the United States? My watch must be fast because I thought it was 2008 not 1948. Do we really need to tie up courts to decide if people have the right to enjoy a girl eating her own feces and menstruation whilst between two donkeys!?! And the judge can't be a judge anymore becuase he has porn on his website/homepage?
There are way too many morons with way too much authority in this country. Especially when they make Mexico look like the true Land of the Free... donkey show that is.
Posted by: Sandy Underpants | Jun 13, 2008 12:13:26 AM
Oh no! Not a man with porn on his computer! What is this world coming to? In other shocking world news, the sun rose today.
Posted by: Becky | Jun 13, 2008 8:03:42 AM
And you thought "I know it when I see it" was bad.
Posted by: dcl | Jun 13, 2008 10:49:00 AM
Or perhaps he is just attempting to understand said principle by doing legal research.
Posted by: dcl | Jun 13, 2008 10:50:37 AM