BrendanLoy.com: Homepage | Photoblog | Weatherblog | Photos | Old blog archives

About me


I'm Brendan Loy, a 26-year-old graduate of USC and Notre Dame now living and working in Knoxville, Tennessee. My wife Becky and I are brand-new parents of a beautiful baby girl, born on New Year's Eve.

I'm a big-time sports fan, a politics, media & law junkie, an astronomy buff, a weather nerd, an Apple aficionado, a Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter fanatic, and an all-around dork. My blog is best-known for its coverage of Hurricane Katrina, but I blog about anything and everything that interests me.

You can contact me at irishtrojan [at] gmail.com, or donate to my "tip jar" by clicking the link below:

June 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member

« Wolf Blitzer, Wolf Blitzer | Main | CNN Breaking News »

Fox: Hillary wins Ohio

Brit Hume: "As you can see, the margin is now almost 200,000 votes. There are a lot of votes still out there, we concede, but Hillary Clinton wins Ohio, and wins it, possibly -- for all we know, she may win it comfortably."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/38891/26798054

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fox: Hillary wins Ohio:

Comments

Another state for the 'big state' argument.

The "big state" argument sucks. The far better argument is that voters are souring on Obama as they learn more about him, the media glow wears off, etc. That argument, I can see potentially gaining traction, depending on how things go over the next couple of months. For the first time in quite a while, I can conceive of a possible Clinton nomination, for that reason... but not because of some irrelevant "big state" nonsense.

P.S. The "diversity" argument doesn't fly. Obama's victories, as a whole, show massive diversity in terms of the "types" of voters he's attracting. Neither candidate is by any means one-dimensional in terms of their support.

I know the argument sucks but brace yourself to hear about it more and more.

Agree, the "big states" are just as likely to go Dem over Rep in November whether the nominee is Clinton or Obama.

Oh, I know.

Frankly, though, I think the Clinton folks now have a few legitimate arguments they can use, and it would be great if they'd stick with those, and leave the intellectually dishonest spin (e.g., picking and choosing which states "count") out of it.

Too much to ask, I know.

Yes, Joe Mama. Or just as unlikely, as in the case of Texas.

True.

Just heard an interesting point raised that the Democrats may decide to change the rules and decide to seat delegates from FL and MI because to not do so would risk alienating Dem voters in those two key states in November.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Friends & family