BrendanLoy.com: Homepage | Photoblog | Weatherblog | Photos | Old blog archives

About me


I'm Brendan Loy, a 26-year-old graduate of USC and Notre Dame now living and working in Knoxville, Tennessee. My wife Becky and I are brand-new parents of a beautiful baby girl, born on New Year's Eve.

I'm a big-time sports fan, a politics, media & law junkie, an astronomy buff, a weather nerd, an Apple aficionado, a Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter fanatic, and an all-around dork. My blog is best-known for its coverage of Hurricane Katrina, but I blog about anything and everything that interests me.

You can contact me at irishtrojan [at] gmail.com, or donate to my "tip jar" by clicking the link below:

June 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member

« March 2, 2008 | Main | March 4, 2008 »

March 3, 2008

Eco-nuts prime suspects in ironic home fires

By David K.

The eco-terrorist whack-jobs of the Earth Liberation Front are the likely culprits behind an arson attack which burned down three homes and damaged a fourth in a suburb of Seattle earlier this morning. Whoever set the fires left behind graffiti with the initials ELF which slammed the houses, built as part of the Street of Dreams last year. The multi-million dollar homes were certified green homes, one of them achieving the highest possible rating. All the homes included recycled materials in their construction, water conservation, and other green techniques. Fortunately none of the homes were as yet occupied and no one was harmed.

The eco-morons from the ELF have been responsible for other such attacks in the Pacific Northwest, including setting fire to a horticulture lab at the University of Washington in 2001.

Quote of the day

By Brendan Loy

"They keep moving the goal posts, but at some point you run out of field." --Obama campaign manager David Plouffe, on the latest Clinton spin.

If Hillary wins narrow, meaningless popular-vote victories in Ohio and Texas tomorrow ("meaningless" because she'll gain very little, if any, ground in the delegate race), and if Team Billary manages to successfully hoodwink the media into painting it as another Clinton "comeback" (as happened on Super Tuesday), I may just jump out the window.

Relatedly, the Clinton camp is now -- incredibly -- touting Hillary's home states of New York and Arkansas on its list of "states that matter." What's particularly telling is that between five and seven of the nine listed states would be expected to be utterly uncompetitive (in one direction or the other) in November, so it's difficult to understand why anyone would premise an electability argument on them. (My full rebuttal to this nonsense is here.)

Will Hillary march forth?

By Brendan Loy

The New York Times's election blog explains the stakes of tomorrow's big vote:

[F]our primary contests on Tuesday could extinguish Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s hope of overtaking Senator Barack Obama. ...

Yet the hinge could still swing either way. If Mrs. Clinton carries the behemoths of Ohio and Texas — despite her opponent’s momentum and financial advantage — Mr. Obama may rue this week as both an end and a beginning.

Specifically, Tuesday could be the end of his coronation as Democratic standard-bearer and the beginning of a wrenching springtime struggle. With Clinton victories on Tuesday, neither political realities nor “delegate math” would preclude it.

As an explanation of that last line, the Times goes on to note that "[u]nless Mrs. Clinton quits, either candidate will need votes from the so-called superdelegates." Although that's technically true, it should be noted that there's a huge difference between needing a handful of superdelegates to shore up a clear pledged-delegate majority, versus needing a large majority of superdelegates to overturn a clear pledged-delegate majority. For instance, if Obama continues winning delegates at his current pace, he'd finish with a lead of 1,718 to 1,498. Out of the 820 superdelegates and Edwards delegates*, Obama would need just 306 (37.3%) while Clinton would need 526 (64.1%). How she could possibly convince nearly two-thirds of the unpledged delegates to buck the popular will is beyond me. So I think the "delegate math" is still a major problem for her.

Nevertheless, the Times is right in the big picture: if Obama doesn't land a knockout blow tomorrow, or at least a punch that starts a slow bleed which would get Hillary out of the race within 3-10 days, then this race is going to continue well into the spring. There's nothing on the calendar (with the exception of various low-profile delegate selection events that won't generate any momentum) between next Tuesday (Mississippi) and April 22 (Pennsylvania), so if Hillary isn't out of the race by, say, next Thursday, I can't see what would convince her to get out before late April.

(Hat tip, sorta, on the headline, to C. Stephen Ludlow.)

*This assumes that Edwards gets his 14 Iowa delegates, which is unlikely, as I explained here. But since the fate of those delegates remains uncertain, it makes sense to count them in the non-Clinton/Obama category for now.

P.S. Interesting aside: tomorrow is the original "Super Tuesday." The reason such phrases as "Super Duper Tuesday" arose to describe February 5 was to differentiate it from the true "Super Tuesday," March 4. But as more and more states moved their primaries to February 5, people simply stopped using the "Super Tuesday" label to describe March 4 and started applying it, sans "Duper," to February 5 instead. Yet here we are, on the eve of the original Super Tuesday, and it's more "super" than ever: the entire Democratic race hangs in the balance.

Friends & family