Tropical Storm Olga?
By Brendan Loy
In what would be a surprise ending to the just-about-average 2007 hurricane season -- which officially "ended" on November 30, not that Mother Nature cares about such artificial, human-imposed deadlines -- a tropical or subtropical storm may form in the Atlantic several hundred miles east of Puerto Rico over the next few days. The National Hurricane Center has issued two Special Tropical Disturbance Statements on the system today, and Glenn Reynolds actually tipped me off via e-mail to an AP article about it. (That's a first. Heh.)
Alan Sullivan, usually a skeptic when it comes to weakling storms, breathes nary a word about "count-padding" and states that "there is more and more model consensus that a tropical storm may form" out of what is currently being called Invest 94. By contrast, Dr. Jeff Masters is more skeptical, concluding, "I don't expect 94L will ever develop into a tropical storm." We shall see. If 94L does develop into a named storm, its name would be Olga.
Meanwhile, Dr. William Gray has issued his first long-range forecast for the 2008 Atlantic hurricane season, in which he calls for a moderately above-average season. Of course, as I've stated repeatedly -- most recently in an Instalanched November 26 post -- I think these forecasts do more harm than good because of their inaccuracy, the public misconceptions they inevitably create, and the charged atmosphere created by the politicization of weather that has taken hold in recent years. As Dr. Masters writes:
[Public scorn of these forecasts is] the inevitable result of a culture where seasonal hurricane forecasts, which are not very good, are excessively hyped by both the forecasters and the media. The forecasters have set them selves up for such shrill condemnations by putting out these very public forecasts, complete with press conferences, but not properly emphasizing the uncertainties and low skill of their forecasts.
To their credit, Dr. Gray & co. have tried to emphasize that point this year, stating in the abstract of their report: "These real-time operational early December forecasts have not shown forecast skill over climatology during the period 1992-2007." In other words, they have no track record of success in meaningfully predicting anything. Dr. Masters writes, "By clearly stating their lack of forecast skill, the CSU team's December 2007 forecast is a great step towards improving this situation. The public needs to know that these December forecasts as yet have no skill, and are unworthy of the media attention they get." Indeed. Take note, MSM. (Eric Berger has a good post on this issue, too.)



My other sites