By Brendan Loy
John McCain and Joe Lieberman:
The Bush administration clung for too long to a flawed strategy in this war, despite growing evidence of its failure. Now advocates of withdrawal risk making the exact same mistake, by refusing to re-examine their own conviction that Gen. Petraeus's strategy cannot succeed and that the war is "lost," despite rising evidence to the contrary.
The Bush administration finally had the courage to change course in Iraq earlier this year. After hearing from Gen. Petraeus today, we hope congressional opponents of the war will do the same.
Some of that "rising evidence to the contrary" can be found in Michael Totten's absolutely fascinating first-hand account from Ramadi, a city once written off by the Marines as irretrievably lost, but now reclaimed thanks to the surge. It's the most convincing account I've read of the success we're (finally) having in Iraq, and frankly, I don't understand why the hell it's being left to individual conservative bloggers to write accounts like this. Where is the media? Where is the Bush Administration's vaunted propaganda machine? Seriously, why aren't we hearing more about this sort of thing? If we were, I think it would go a long way toward convincing Americans that there actually is a purpose to remaining in Iraq, that there are real, attainable goals we can achieve by continuing the fight -- that we can still win, and that "victory" actually means something real and tangible.
Anyway, whatever you think of the war, Petraeus, or the "surge," Totten's article is excellent and I highly recommend it. (Double hat tip: InstaPundit.)
CORRECTION: In comments,
Totten himself writes, "for the record, I am neither a liberal nor a conservative." Well, I for one certainly know what that's like. :) I stand corrected, and I apologize for the error.
My other sites